Health
Medical Negligence Vs. Personal Injury – When to Make a Claim
You may find yourself at a crossroads when it comes to your healthcare-related civil claim. There are two kinds of claim which can apply to having suffered an injury: medical negligence, and personal injury. But what do these terms mean, and which one might apply to your specific case? Read on to find out the differences between medical negligence and personal injury, and how they may apply to you.
Personal Injury
Personal injury cases are civil cases used to establish fault for an injury, and claim compensation for the damages incurred by that injury. Essentially, you may require the services of a personal injury solicitor if you believe you were in an accident that was not your fault. The party at fault could be an individual or organisation, with varying degrees of abstraction depending on the injury-causing event. For example, if you were to slip and fall as a result of a faulty washing machine leaking water, the manufacturer of that washing machine may be liable. A high-profile example of this is the infamous McDonalds lawsuit by Stella Liebeck in 1994. Though the U.S. law system differs from the UK’s, the principles of personal injury remain the same – and in this case, Liebeck’s burns were not the fault of the employee that served the coffee, but instead the organisation that mandated the serving of coffee at that temperature.
Medical Negligence
A medical negligence case involves, at its core, the assertion that a medical practitioner’s failure to fulfil their duty of care to a patient resulted in their impairment or injury. If you have suffered as a result of a missed diagnosis, misdiagnosis, overpresciption, underprescription, mistakes made in surgery or even abuse at the hands of a medical professional, a medical negligence case would apply to you.
Medical negligence is a complex field, wherein several factors need to be established and confirmed before a case can proceed. Duty of care needs to have been established between practitioner and patient, and evidence of failure to fulfil it documented. Then, dereliction – or the action/inaction which directly resulted in the injury of the patient – needs to be illustrated, as well as the damages incurred from that injury. Lastly, causation needs to be proven; the practitioner’s dereliction must be conclusively documented to have directly caused the injuries for which damages are costed.
What are the Differences?
Personal injury claims can be against any guilty party, and are most commonly used for public incidents such as workplace injuries or car accidents. Medical negligence cases, however, are highly specific to the field of medicine. Any medical negligence cases would hold the healthcare provider to be at fault for your injury, with specific practitioners named in the process. In the vast majority of negligence cases, the NHS are the defendants – though in some cases, claims against GPs and private practitioners occur outside of their employment by a health service, and compensation is paid from separate insurance funds.
Health
BioLongevity Labs: How Two Biohackers Are Making Longevity Safe for the Mainstream
Humans have been looking for ways to extend their lifespan for hundreds of years. Medicine has made impressive strides, but for many, the effects of aging are still painfully real.
Through BioLongevity Labs, biohackers and entrepreneurs Jay Campbell and Josh Felber aim to introduce ordinary people to potentially life-changing compounds called peptides. Campbell and Felber come from very different backgrounds.
Campbell is a five-time international bestselling author and globally recognized leader in the health-optimization space. Felber is a serial entrepreneur who excels at scaling businesses.
For both men, BioLongevity Labs is more than just a business venture — it’s about helping everyday people discover something that just might prolong and improve their lives.
“Your body inevitably changes as the years pile on,” says Campbell. “Your energy drops, and wrinkles start showing up uninvited. Peptides can change everything.”
Many people have probably heard the term “peptide” in passing. Some may know they’re associated with longevity. Most people just don’t have a strong grasp of how they work.
A peptide is a short chain of amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins. Essentially, peptides are like shorter, simpler proteins. That might sound unremarkable, but the real magic of peptides lies in how they work.
They function as signaling or “messenger” molecules telling the body to perform specific functions. Many peptides function similarly to hormones. A relevant example is GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) receptor agonists. This class of medications includes semaglutide and tirzepatide, two wildly popular weight-loss drugs.
“These peptides aren’t just another biohacking fad,” Campbell explains. “They enhance insulin secretion and suppress glucagon release to balance blood sugar levels and promote sustainable weight loss”. But what sets GLP-1 receptor agonists apart is their ability to regulate hunger.
Through the reduction of appetite and increased feelings of fullness, it is far easier for dieters to stick to a calorie deficit.” Although GLP-1 receptor agonists are widely prescribed, most peptides aren’t.
Campbell asserts, because many peptides have the potential to cure illnesses by treating the fundamental root cause, they go against America’s “sick care” model of healthcare. They potentially threaten drug companies and their bottom line.
“Peptides are simultaneously a dream come true for mankind and the worst possible nightmare for the pharmaceutical industry,” says Campbell. “It’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s pure economics and psychology in action. People will do whatever it takes to make as much money as possible in a free-market society, even if it means suppressing a superior solution.”
Patients probably aren’t going to be introduced to peptides through the healthcare system. Many discover them on their own. But for the many people who don’t have a solid understanding of how they work molecularly or even what dose to take, there is a risk. That’s precisely what BioLongevity Labs’ co-founders are attempting to address.
Jay Campbell has dedicated his life to educating people about therapeutic peptides and optimized hormones, and along with his partner Josh Felber, they’ve created a company offering filler-free, third-party tested peptides and bioregulators.
Campbell and Felber stress the fact that BioLongevity Labs isn’t meant to be a replacement for traditional medical care. Instead, its products bridge the gap between clinical and extra-clinical care. There’s no magic pill or single solution to solve the problem of aging.
But thanks to the development of specialized peptides, bioregulators, and small molecules, we’re closer than we’ve ever been before.
-
Tech5 years agoEffuel Reviews (2021) – Effuel ECO OBD2 Saves Fuel, and Reduce Gas Cost? Effuel Customer Reviews
-
Tech6 years agoBosch Power Tools India Launches ‘Cordless Matlab Bosch’ Campaign to Demonstrate the Power of Cordless
-
Lifestyle7 years agoCatholic Cases App brings Church’s Moral Teachings to Androids and iPhones
-
Lifestyle5 years agoEast Side Hype x Billionaire Boys Club. Hottest New Streetwear Releases in Utah.
-
Tech7 years agoCloud Buyers & Investors to Profit in the Future
-
Lifestyle5 years agoThe Midas of Cosmetic Dermatology: Dr. Simon Ourian
-
Health7 years agoCBDistillery Review: Is it a scam?
-
Entertainment7 years agoAvengers Endgame now Available on 123Movies for Download & Streaming for Free
